Questions: Unexpected Intimacy
“Thong, bikini, boyshorts, g-string, briefs, or bloomers?”
Pick one. Then …
Turn . your . volume . up
One’s preferences can mirror their personality and at times their demeanor. The question that I posed, is one that I’ve been randomly asking for some time. I don’t remember when, or why I originally started asking it … but as I trace the responses I know it’s been at least three years. At one period, I asked it because I wanted to see if the person’s tastes were similar to my own. I mean, it was never just a question about underwear. It was actually a series of questions asked quickly, and randomly. The answer was to be given without time to think about it. The more time that it’s thought about, the more skewed the results. As such, no variables or details were given in advance. However, that didn’t stop some people from saying “it depends on what I’m wearing”, or choosing multiple items.
It usually took awhile for the person to pick one without giving it much thought. So I’d hasten my pace with each series until they were instinctly responding. I remember one such case with a Mexican woman, over two years ago. She enjoyed it immensely and was very disappointed when my mind could only chuck out ellipses. We went at it for no less than 20 minutes non-stop. She later asked me why I did that (since I randomly began doing so in the midst of a conversation). I said that many people like to believe they are a certain way … when they are not. While others put up a facade. Regardless, if you get a person to a point where they are purely reacting … as a group, their answers are quite definitive. She asked me to elaborate. I ended up breaking down the various mentalities, natures, and perceptions … reflective of the choices made.
There are too many variables as to “why” a person chose that item. For example, “around the house, do you wear socks, slippers, or walk barefoot?” The person may wear socks because they do not like their feet to get dirty. They may wear them because they like the warmth, or the feeling of cotton against their skin. The first person may desire security, or is paranoid. The second may be affectionate, or insecure. The third may be sexual, or sensual. The one who walks barefoot … sensual or carefree. However, to understand which one a person truly is … no single answer is definitive. Many blind assumptions are being made. So depending on the preceeding choice, the questions I ask in succession adapts … as it’s always catered to that individual. Those successive questions give clarity or correction to the previous.
In a few cases, the contradictions were so major that I had to pause and ask for clarity (or maybe I made the wrong assumption sometime earlier). Regardless, after all of that it’s still nothing more than a possibility. A person might have those preferences due to habit, but their true nature may be completely different from what they were taught or how they were raised. However, when asked about intimate items or things consistently within one’s personal space … it lessens the room for error. Typically I restricted the questions to their bedroom, personal bathroom (if they had one), etc. If I asked about underwear, I usually complimented that with a series of questions about shoes. “Heels, flats, sandals, sneakers, timbs, or boots?” Or even handbags / pocketbooks.
Sometimes it was more than a list. “How many pillows do you have on your bed? Do you remove most of them before you go to sleep? Do you sleep with a body pillow? Do you have stuffed animals on your bed? Do you have any in your bedroom at all? How many mirrors are in your bedroom? Count them.” I imagine in those moments, the survey may have seemed like an interrogation. Yet, I have never encountered a person who disliked that or did not answer. It’s possible that the presentation made the difference. However, it still wasn’t something I asked “just anyone.” I’ve only ever asked it of strangers or people I didn’t know very well, but intuitively knew it would be okay with. Ultimately, it ended up being entertaining for both of us.
I enjoyed thinking about the various possibilities, tangents, and possible supportive questions to be able to type the next set of questions in less than five seconds. I didn’t give myself time to overthink it either. I wanted my reactions to be as raw as theirs. I don’t know how I understood those things, or where the reactions came from … never really thought about it or questioned it. Although I was a psychology major in college … I’ve actually never read any of the course material. All of the tests I took, I answered purely based on what I learned through observation or life. Regardless, I really enjoyed those moments where the person quickly spat a single answer with no excuses or justifications. Those series flew by faster than a normal and consistent conversation would have. Though somewhere along the line, I stopped doing the live surveys and my usual initial question morphed into something else entirely.
—
“What color, cut, and material panties are you wearing?”
What was your reaction to that question? Did you laugh at my idiocy? Were you bothered by it, or did you think nothing of it? When I initially started asking that I didn’t really acknowledge the types of reactions. It wasn’t until my friend Nicolette responded to it negatively that I truly took notice. Since her reaction was completely unexpected. Though as I replayed the previous moments where I asked others, I realized that their reactions were negative as well. This to me did not make any sense what-so-ever. I mean, I can understand that it’s one of the major taboos … but I could not understand “why”, and I was curious as to “how major?”
So with my child-like curiosity. I ventured to understand it. I knew it was a question which would invoke a negative reaction in most people. As such, I only asked the question of people who intimately know me … or people who I honestly thought it “wouldn’t” invoke such a reaction in. I was extremely surprized by what happened. Every single person blew it totally out of porportion. This is what I expected of people who do not know me, or have never interacted with me. However, I was asking this question of people I have taken showers with. People I have seen butt-ass naked, like it was nothing. People who share things with me that are so intimate, they have literally never said it to anyone else.
Yet, the reactions were “you jerk”, “dick”, “asshole”, “fuck you”, etc.
I was left with a “wow”, reaction. I wouldn’t have predicted that in a million years. I mean, some people even cut me off / out of their life because I was “such a creep.” That of course bothered me, but it didn’t stop me from continuing. I am not one to fear the consequences of my actions. However, it awoken me to the reality that there isn’t a single person I know who does not have some type of defense up with me. Regardless of how intimate someone may be, even if it’s the most they’ve ever been open with anyone … they still have defenses up. I guess I was naive. However, I wanted to find at least one person who wouldn’t react in such a way.
Some reactions were milder than others, but I believe in my life such a woman doesn’t exist. I have concluded that although some people may answer it without requiring justification, they will still at least be initially taken back by the question. Yet, I can’t understand “why”. Maybe it’s merely because I don’t want to. However, allow me to elucidate my perspective on the question.
We live in a society where we see underwear ads on the street. Where the lingerie section or department, isn’t exclusive nor closed off. Where men receive subscriptions of Victoria’s Secret … more than women. Where it was a “fad” for a woman to have her thong showing out of the top of her jeans. Where panty shots are common in cartoons (see Ecchi). Where people ask questions like, “what’s your favorite position?” Where although some women will not permit a sexual conversation initially … it’s still a “standard” or consistent question which is asked. Where people will discuss things infinitely more intimate. However, a question like “what color panties are you wearing?” is significantly more taboo.
To almost every person I essentially said, “you know I have a vivid imagination. If I wanted to imagine your underwear, trust me … I do not need to ask you that question. What are you preventing? What are you protecting? Why are you reacting in such a manner? Do you not know me better than that?” No one answered those questions. Instead, most of them just answered the panties question. The only ones that didn’t were those who refused to even listen to me any further. My observation is that every single person I asked that question, because it was unexpected … they immediately or instinctively went back to their childish or immature perception of it.
They didn’t have time to think about it. Their reaction was pure. With some people the reaction was so raw, that it was overwhelming and they couldn’t think about afterwards … or … if they did, the thoughts they had merely supported how much of “creep” I was. The mildest reaction was from Jessica Marie, and I love her reaction. Though make no mistake about it, it still bothered her. Even after she knew my justification. So I eventually stopped asking it (I used to ask her it randomly long before Nicolette’s reaction). Is Jessica Marie the most secure woman I know? I wonder. Maybe JennaJenna reviews
would’ve responded mildly as well. It also, still bothered Nicolette, even after she was able to answer it (of course I asked on more than one occasion, not because the answer mattered but because the reaction did).
Seriously … can someone tell me what I’m missing. What I seem to be neglecting? I must be missing something, cause this just doesn’t make any sense to me. Is the problem merely the approach? If I asked any question in such a manner, would it invoke the same response? “What color socks are you wearing?” Yeah, I think that might weird them out as well. Though, can someone explain to me why that is such a violation? Why it’s reacted to with such hostility, even from people who should know me better than that? “I’ve seen you butt naked, I’ve even given you a bikini wax, yet I’m a jerk the moment I ask what color underwear you have on … even if i was the one who picked them out this morning as you were getting dressed.” Models even walk around naked in front of strangers, but still that question is taboo.
I’ll stop playfully asking that question, but … someone please explain / enlighten me. Also, is there anything that’s equally as taboo? If so what is it or what are they? Do you think that it shouldn’t be so taboo with the way our society / world is? Lastly, if I’ve ever asked you the series of questions / freestyled survey … jog my memory please, and let me know that I have.
Anyway … Gone.
- Prasand J.
Prasand J.
on April 9th, 2007
[06:45:53 PM] Prasand: what are you doing with your left hand at the moment?
[06:46:07 PM] Prasand: lmfao@my random ass questions
[06:46:29 PM] Prasand: I think it would weird out most people.
[06:46:34 PM] Prasand: blar.
[06:46:42 PM] Jessica Marie: picking up my drink
[06:46:42 PM] *** Auto-response sent to Jessica Marie: “It takes strength to be yourself, and stamina to be someone else.” – Prasand J.
[06:46:51 PM] Prasand: what’cha drinking
—
That little excerpt spawned an interesting thought. Maybe the problem isn’t the question at all. With the other questions that I perceive to be infinitely more intimate, the theme is … “those questions are expected.” They are standard topics of conversation. What if the problem is, people have learned how to cope with those things … however, they are virtually unprepared for things which aren’t consistent. The violation in a sense would be subconscious, and is about putting them in a position where they are weak. Like the person spontaneously asked to give a speech.
When people are prepared with retorts and rebuttals, it’s their opportunity to shine. Yet, when they are not they are in many ways afraid of falling flat on their face and embarassing themselves. This is not to say answering a panties question would embarass them or anything. But rather it’s a situation which might parallel what goes on mentally / subconsciously. People are weirded out by things which are abnormal. Things which are abnormal are things they are not used to. So anything out of the ordinary, in theory should apply. The less a person is prepared to cope with something, the more prone they are to feel violated.
Just wanted to extend that prospect. Can you see that? Or is that completely outlandish?
Sang Yi
on April 9th, 2007
after living with four working girls in the city you see and hear a lot of things. perhaps they believe you crossed a line of privacy that was reserved for the same sex.
i notice a lot of the times when i ask questions that pertain to the identity of the female species they often reply with hostile if not accusatory understatements.
it would same if a woman asked “why do you think she has a great ass” if she were hanging out with the guys around a bar on a friday night.
great journal entry nonetheless; take it as a postive thing, the rainbow of personalities we are faced with sharpens our taste for women.
just like how my friend mel thinks that her dates were ultimately an audition for marriage. and vice versa; although, calling someone a creep shouldn’t discourage you from asking questions–as you say, a child like curiousity.
(a good soundtrack also, it would be amusing to make a short film based on this)
Prasand J.
on April 9th, 2007
I like that!
That was a nice parallel @ the guys, and an interesting perspective. I mean, while many of my female friends treat me like the gay best friend … the fact remains, I’m not. Even if I was, there must be a limit to which their usual social habits @ men versus women kick in.
I’m gonna let that marinate for a bit.
Sang Yi
on April 10th, 2007
speaking of which, a lot of people think im gay all of a sudden.
Prasand J.
on April 10th, 2007
lol. What made them start to draw that conclusion?
Jenna Marshall
on April 12th, 2007
I dont think i’d be offended if you asked me about my knickers….really….at all. Its just like me asking what colour boxers you’re wearing, Or y-fronts, or pants. idk. And i dont know a single guy that would get offended at that! Some girls are just way too petty about such things.
toodle pip
Prasand J.
on April 13th, 2007
Did I do the full survey or was it just parts? I guess I could take a look at the logs, but our logs are long. Blar … checking.
LMFAO@me … it wasn’t the full survey. It was because you asked me what you should wear to lunch and I impulsively retorted, “birthday suit” … “you’re the entertainment” … “bring the cake also”. In there you said, “i hate thongs.” Normally a single preference isn’t definitive. However, in that convo you indicated why you disliked thongs. Although I didn’t give you the survey, I did break down the preferences. To which you then volunteered yours. Though I’ll refrain from posting that (I originally copied and pasted the convo, but realized you might not like that. Normally I wouldn’t have cared, I guess my desire to be considerate is “finally” kicking in, lol).
I said you need or want security because of that list of items, not just your underwear. To which I then elucidated. However, all of that was done either before you said grannies, or you didn’t say grannies (I scanned only the first hour of our convo). If you eventually said it, it probably just confirmed the previous perception.
—
Those things aside. The thing about boyshorts is for it to be factored … the material matters. Which is probably why I eventually adapted my question to include “material” (with thongs the material becomes insignificant in comparison to the lack of material). For example, with boyshorts certain types of lace are more airey than others. Thus promoting a feeling of almost wearing nothing at all … thus they may be slightly carefree, sensual, or sexual. Silk, or satin being smooth to the touch … the person may be sensual. If the person “hates” satin, and only wears silk … it’s reflective of the quality or their level of superficiality.
Cotton on the other hand is always a security thing (though only with boyshorts, or things in situations which are protective). Some people will say “because it’s comfortable” … however even that is indicative. “Why is it comfortable?” The easiest way to illustrate it is … “how do you feel wearing anything less in such situations?” If the person would feel uncomfortable, then their comfort is reflective of their security. They may not need to be completely protected, but definitely more than anything less (so it is not indicative of being “extremely” insecure).
For example, Jessica Marie wears cotton boyshorts around the house. She feels comfortable in them. However, she hates to wear them when she has clothes on. She then feels uncomfortable in them. Which in that case she wears thongs or g/t-strings. Her reason is because of her sense of touch (we’ve discussed it). Which indicates her “sensuality.” She feels too restricted, which indicates the existence of her “carefree-ness” (thus she’s a carefree sensual type). However, the fact that she wears cotton boyshorts around the house is indicative of insecurity … or rather “she’s sensual but not completely carefree.” Whereas my ex Ria when I essentially lived with her, she wore thongs around the house … even with company over.
I highly doubt she still does so though. I realize she was more carefree when I was still around. In general, Ria hands down is the most carefree person I know, which is why I said to my ex Jessica in the previous comments that she and Ria can’t really be factored.
—
Though in summation … it was the list of preferences you volunteered (it was very thorough) which is why I drew those conclusions. A single preference is not definitive. If you’d like to see the convo I’ll send it.
Prasand J.
on April 13th, 2007
Yeah, I realized that after I remembered you took a picture of your underwear … because you were trying to describe what you were going to wear … and it was rather difficult, so I said “take a picture.” To which you didn’t hesitate to do.
Though after realizing that … I also wondered if it may be because of your carefree nature. However, you’re not really that carefree. You don’t give a damn about a lot … because it’s pointless, but you do address pressing things. The truly carefree person is carefree about even important things. They essentially find nothing to be important.
Therefore it’s reflective of your level of security, your carefree-ness is merely a result of your self-security / confidence. While to others you’d claim to be thoughtless or that you didn’t consider it … I know you consider more than you claim. You just tend to disregard it after you’ve thought about it and reached a conclusion. Since you essentially have the mentality of “k, that’s done and over with why hold onto it?” In result you tend to forget, since you didn’t hold onto it.
I’m the same as you in that sense. Although I tend to be anal about thoughts, I still disacard them after concluding. Many assume that I’m impusively doing something, when the reality is … I gave it ample thought, and concluded that it wasn’t important. You’re definitely more non-chalant than I though … and as a result more secure. However, almost everyone is insecure to some degree. For the mind creates insecurities, and if one thinks consciously … then they are insecure.
Only thoughtless or secure people can be careless.
You’re definitely a rare breed.
We should reproduce.
=P
I even think your issues with trust aren’t really psychologically based … but instead is physically, sensually, and intuitively based. Most psychiatrists would be at a loss when it comes to you, but their feeling of helplessness would make them to conclude some premature psychosis … without actually understanding you and your nature.
Jenna Marshall
on April 13th, 2007
“Most psychiatrists would be at a loss when it comes to you” haha, i dont know why that made me laugh. God i’m complicated. OH BY THE WAY, i passed my driving test. I’m sure that’s made you’re day even better. Im chuffed. :)
Tifanny Urrea
on April 13th, 2007
well I sure as hell like my boy shorts and granny panties and will now walk around in them when everyone is around. But u did tell me that wearin those showed some insecurities? =P
Prasand J.
on April 13th, 2007
you’re not complicated at all … it’s just that insecure people wouldn’t really understand. Psychiatrists are used to dealing with “normal” people … which ironically are more “complicated” because they have plenty more issues, and there’s so many variables and tangents. As such psychiatrists are used to looking into something deeply.
Whereas with you they’d have to take it for what it is, which they are not used to. So they’d rather say … “she doesn’t pay attention because she’s narcissistic / self-absorbed” instead of “importance is relative, her values and perception is different. She just doesn’t that to be important, and instead focuses on other matters which are important.” Because you do not fit into the average perception, you’d have to be gauged by inverse standards.
Karena Nicohl
on August 2nd, 2007
You write so unbelievably well. I am extremely jealous.
Nicole
Prasand J.
on October 22nd, 2007
domo arigatou gozaimasu