Rends: Straitjacketed Love
(this entry is the product of an ongoing conversation with the lovely ChristineChristine reviews
).
A lighter ignites the sound of an inhale which gives fire the desire to change frames of mind from life to ashes. He asks as he pulls away, and an overhanging bulb sways shining brightly a spot of rays down upon my frame, “Where were you the night of the twenty-third?” Smoke escapes my parted lips, as I’m leaned back in a chair elbow propping and holding my body from sliding upon the right armrest suggesting a relaxed position … I exhale, “Before or after midnight?” “After.” “With my lover.” “Where were you before?” I exhale, “With my lover.” “Then why did you ask for clarity?” “Either I’m speaking of two different people, or am amusing myself with you. Take your pick.” “We are not here to play games with you Mr. –.”
My identity is striken from his lips, and words fall short as if he has no clue who the fuck he’s dealing with. Clearly, he doesn’t. “Surely you don’t expect me to tolerate this or you without some form of entertainment”, I chuckle softly. “You can laugh all the way to a cell if that’s how you want to play it.” “On the grounds that I found you to be a clown? You must be mad.” Fearlessly, I called his bluff. “I know your type. The kind that masks his insecurities with humor.” “Subject a lesser man to your premature psycho-analysis. There are significantly more possibilities than your egotistical mind is allowing you to perceive at this time.”
His partner approaches him and whispers into his ear.
“Where were the two of you?” “In bed.” “All night?” “Probably, we tend to fuck a lot and between her wearing me out and rendering me unconscious I do not recall.” I pause and then continue, “Oh yes we were at a formal social and gallery viewing before. We managed to escape all of the elbow-rubbing long enough to have a quick fuck in the women’s washroom.” “Were there many in attendance?” “In the washroom? Only a few. I think they were enjoying it as they listened in. How about you?” “I meant at the event.” “I know, get a clue. Though to tell you the truth I was oblivious most of the time, as her accessory I didn’t pay her peers much mind. Though I imagine, yes.” “Do you suggest that such an alibi would hold up?” “Then that suggests you don’t know who she is.”
His partner whispers again.
“Tell me, how are things at home?” “My personal affairs are none of your concern.” “Does your wife know about your mistress, and vice-versa?” He gets my complete attention, not to mention I’m highly irked. He can see my discomfort and asks, “Did I hit a nerve?” “Men must learn now with pity to dispense, for policy sits above conscience.” He looks at his partner and says, “Can you believe this guy? Getting all Shakespearean.” His partner says, “I think that’s Timon of Athens[R].” I nod politely, sincerely. The interrogating officer says, “Was that supposed to be a threat?” “No, a warning and promise. Though I’ll elaborate more clearly. Not even Shakespeare himself could weave a story so tragic as the fate which would befall upon you if you continue to test my patience.”
His partner steps back.
“Oh I get it, you’re the provoking detective and he’s the lie detector. So while you get me to talk, he’s watching my reactions and telling you the next action, since you’re too close to notice. I like this dance. Let’s do it. Continue, please.” “You find this funny?” “Very. Can you not see the smile on my face? Should I show some teeth?” “You are wasting our time.” “You have that confused. See because I came here of my own accord, and can easily walk out that door. You would not be able to stop me. So get it straight, you are on my time … not the other way around, and I will do whatever I desire with my time. Maybe in the process you’ll get what you seek. Do you get me?”
Steaming he gets up, and his partner takes the forefront. “Prasand, you don’t mind if I call you Prasand do you?” “Not at all, I appreciate your presence.” “Thank you Prasand. While we are greatful for you coming in, we’re trying to solve a case … can you please be more cooperative?” “For you, yes. What would you like to know?” “Then let’s go back. Did your mistress know about your wife?” “I’ll let that slide only once, please do not use that word again … my bias finds it to be demeaning.” “Is she not your woman on the side?” “She’s primary, always.” “So you’d say things at home weren’t that great?” “Yes, but things at home are fine.” “What do you mean?” “Are you married?”
“Yes.”
“Actually, you wouldn’t be a good example. From your stature I can tell things at home are pleasant. So instead let’s take your partner for example. He goes home to his wife. Does she greet him like she used to? Does she kiss or touch him the same?” “No.” “Due to the state of relationships, the reality is women seek and enjoy titles. They find a false sense of security in those words. There was a time when it truly meant something. However, our society has devalued it. Like money which is nothing more than a piece of paper without any actual backing. Then with the advent of social independence, when a woman is secure she no longer finds the need to try as much. It’s the same with men, which leads to the death of passion. Then when the passion dies, and she’s no longer blind … she starts to see problems that she might not have noticed before. They become issues, but are only so in her mind.”
I exhale, “It’s reality, and I’m fine with that.”
“So you and your wife fought?” “Yes, but fighting isn’t necessarily bad. It can help relationships in many ways, but only if the two can get past it. Her extreme ego prevented that, due to her personal insecurities … her world which I was not privy. She coveted her identity and hid herself even from me, and stopped being a lover after we were married.” “Then why did you marry her?” “Because I was madly in love, and while I wasn’t blind to the reality I accepted her unlike her rejection of me. However, time makes the mind weary.” “Was she violent?” I laugh, “Imagine that. Even with her ego she’s not brave enough to truly fight me. Instead she shuts down, and bottles up.”
I pause … then continue, “I’m a very communicative and open man. Especially when I’m in a relationship. However, the truth can be harsh when one wants to believe in a dream. I can’t force her to let me in. Trust me, I’ve tried. I can only reassure her, support her, be loving and maybe she will deem me worthy enough … but she coveted her pain too much. She wasn’t understanding enough. She kept us separate even when we were together. Then, I met my lover.” “So you told your wife about her?” “Of course.” “How did she take that?” “Not very well to say the least. However, I will not hide myself from nor lie to the woman I gave myself to completely. Her doing so does not justify me doing the same. She always had a problem with the truth. Then again, most people do.”
“So tell me about your lover. Did she know of your wife?” “Of course.” “How did she take it?” “Like a lover would.” “Please elaborate.” “Social misconceptions, impulsive voraciousness, and individuality (egoEgo reviews
) lead to the dilution of values. People have their own perception of words, and as such they lose their meaning. Before you know it, getting married will be the new fad because being a ‘boyfriend’ or ‘girlfriend’ won’t be potent enough to control or satiate the increasing insecurities. While that might be the case, there are a few things which may never change. Words like ‘lover’. Many associate lover with sex. However, that’s a misconception.”
He lights another cigarette for me.
I exhale, “In most other countries besides the United States. Lover is a term which does not denote copulation, but is indicative of the relationship. In Japan for example, your girlfriend is your lover. They don’t use ‘girlfriend’ or ‘boyfriend’ they say lover. However, it’s not a casual relationship like in the United States. The culture promotes true intimacy. Since they are socially reserved, they understand that one must express or share those things with someone. So they don’t have it confused, sharing excessively with friends … who replace the roles of lovers or are lovers without that identity. In Japan, young lovers may exchange a diary. Writing their feelings and thoughts inside, then the next day they give it to the other person … so that they can do the same. It’s in those moments where they are able to convey the things they may not be able say to verbally.”
I exhale, “It’s a great relationship and communication builder. However, it’s only something done with a person who you deem to be a lover. Two virgins can be lovers if the emotion is there. Even in the United States that is the case. There is a reason why men do not casually use the term lover. Some would say it’s unmanly, but the reality is that it’s uncomfortable to say it casually for a reason. While the listeners may just assume ’sex’, the speaker tends to truly feel that term. Think about it. You hear lover, you think ’sex’ … but say lover, do you feel ’sex’? Say, ’she is my lover.’ How does that feel?” “Sincere.” “Women are more prone to use it, but even they don’t since it’s not matched by the other. Lovers are those that share, understand, and are supportive of one another. In order to be those things one must be able to look beyond themselves. People do not know how to be lovers because they are too busy thinking of themselves. They justify excuses, games, and the like to deny the person they love … while claiming to love them.”
“So what you’re saying is, she’s not the type to get jealous because she’s understanding.” “Yes, but not exactly. Insecurity is part of life. Even the most secure person has doubts from time to time. The only thing that’s required of a lover is that they at least try to be understanding. However, she secure and never gets jealous when it comes to me. She’s territorial though. Only because that’s natural. So she in a sense, marks me with her scent. She’s very sexual by nature, a borderline nympho … and because of that, I’m understanding that due to our lives at times she has desires that I cannot always appease. So she sleeps with others, and that’s fine … because she never truly gives herself to another. I’m the only man she’ll allow bare inside of her, or will let cum inside of her. I’m the only man she deems ‘worthy’ enough to breed with.”
“But the two of you have no children?” “We do not.” “Don’t you fuck like rabbits?” *laughs*, “Yes. That may even be an understatement. She tends to get extremely horny when she’s ovulating, where only I can satiate her desires. We probably should have little village by by now.” I laugh, he laughs. I continue, “She happens to be on the pill, because it regulates her period. As such, it’s convenient especially since she doesn’t really want children. However, she will not deny me.” “Do the two of you ever fight?” “Sometimes.” “Does she get violent?” “Sometimes, but we quickly get over it.” “Does she ever get violent enough that she’d do something to your wife in retaliation?” “Ehhhhhh. Yeah, she’d stab a nun … but she’d tell me and we’d laugh about it together afterward.” “Has she ever told you of any interaction with your wife?” “No. She finds my wife to be too insignificant to truly acknowledge.”
“Do you think she ever has, even though she hasn’t said anything?” “No, I don’t doubt her even slightly.” “Would you ever ask her?” “No, not even if you asked me to. I will not doubt her even slightly … ever.” “But it wouldn’t be doubt, you’d just be fulfilling a request.” “I’m not a man that can really be convinced nor talked into action. If you really want to know, ask my wife.” “She’s dead.” “Oh, my bad. So that’s why I was asked to come in?” I laugh. “Didn’t they tell you?” “I think they might’ve but I didn’t really pay attention. I knew it was for something to do with a murder, but figured it had nothing really to do with me or I would’ve been taken in handcuffs.” “You’re seemingly indifferent to be just finding out your wife died.” “Oh, I’ve already come to terms with her death awhile ago. The more one alienates their lover, the more their status as lovers is erased or dies. It was heart-wrenching, torturous even … felt like I was dying. However, I realized it never really existed to begin with. I mean, the emotion was there … definitely. The passion and desire also … intensely. However, it was like being married to a stranger. I don’t think a wife is any less important. If anything she is more. However, a wife who’s not a lover is like a girlfriend without a relationship.”
“Damn, you’re cold.”
“Really? Blar. People want roles, positions but they do not accept the responsibility that comes with them. Every role comes with one. You as a husband have a job, and that’s to be a husband and everything it entails. If you aren’t doing your job, you probably will be replaced. You can argue states of infidelity, saying it’s her fault blaming others but the reality is … if you did not leave room for another man to maneuver you probably wouldn’t have been cheated on. So do your job, or get fired. It’s simple. Those who try to be independent die alone. It’s the reality she wanted and created. At times I wish it wasn’t that way, but it actually is. It was her fate sooner or later if she didn’t change. She wanted to be alone, even in our home. I wasn’t initially accepting of that. Then I realized her desires, and gave her what she wanted irrespective of my desires. An act of love, to overcome oneself for love. What I wanted didn’t matter. I gave her everything I was with little hesitation, and no regrets. Even if it only makes sense to me, a lover to the end.”
- Prasand J.
Do you accept your responsibility as a lover, to please those you love?
Or do you please yourself, only loving them when it’s convenient?
Can you give yourself and love … truly?
Bill
on August 9th, 2007
“Love consists in this, that two solitudes protect and touch and greet each other.” – Rainer Maria Rilke
“Love is the irresistible desire to be irresistibly desired.” – Mark Twain
“Love is more than three words mumbled before bedtime. Love is sustained by action, a pattern of devotion in the things we do for each other every day.” – Nicholas Sparks
All of us have different perspectives of love. We gather these perspectives mainly from experience, observation, Social and religious beliefs or lack there of…. To truly love someone, one must truly know and love the being that he is. We have to know what erks us, makes happy… without that self notion how could one accept what is offered to him and truly give back in return. Before accepting the role and responsibility of a lover, one has to “love when it’s only convenient” to ride himself from all insecurities and truly figure out what he seeks-out of a relationship, Learn what is expected and what to expect. Once that is achieved, then he can blindly give, protect, share….
Prasand J.
on August 9th, 2007
I agree wholeheartedly. There was a time where everything was much simpler. Not saying that tradition is all that great, but rather that there weren’t so many definitions nor perceptions of love. It’s in recent years that individuality (egotism) has so much emphasis. That emphasis is the product of insecurity. People create their own definitions because of their inability to unify with others, and due to their insecure desire to stand out they create conflict. However, the irony is … at the end of that journey we depict, everyone sees the same kind of love. It’s funny how the beginning and the end are usually one and the same.
Thank you for taking the time to read it, and respond. I truly appreciate it.
—
For those who are curious I went at length on the topic of individuality being egotistical, and the problems it creates … on Nicole’s blog entitled: Biters vs. Individuality. It’s in the comments, I posted a few … and be forewarned it’s lengthy but you may find it amusing and / or entertaining. It’s due to that entry that I’ve been getting so much traffic lately @ adds and mails. Smh.
Stephanie Garcia
on August 13th, 2007
Hmm…I do not accept my responsibility as a lover…although I thought that’s what I was doing…No scratch that…I do no accept my responsibility as a lover because the mutual responsibility was not there. I tried doing what was necessary to please my lover but found that he was only doing what was necessary to please me when it was on his time…convenient for him. I suppose that’s shifting the blame and pointing a finger, huh? Hmm…I’m not sure who’s more insecure at this point…me…or him. {Thinks about what you said about becoming more insecure} Yuck. You’re right…in a moment of insecurity I became very sarcastic, even more so than usual, and cynical…although everyone laughed and joined in the conversation, I didn’t feel better after. Instead, I felt more frustrated. I wonder if I will ever be able to truly love and accept someone…with or without a title. Or will I ever be able to accept my role as his lover…and be understanding to his insecurities, whether or not he chooses to acknowledge them, because I know they exist? We say one thing, yet feel another…why is that? Why are we so afraid to truly be ourselves with eachother instead of a diluted version which is more acceptable? Hmm…
I say hmm a lot…lol that’s me thinking :-p
Prasand J.
on August 13th, 2007
Would you like learn how to do the things you cannot? Would you like for me to show you?
Stephanie Garcia
on August 13th, 2007
I was going to ask you that after you told me you read it…that was in my agenda lol…how do you accept things you cannot change?
Prasand J.
on August 13th, 2007
Accepting things you cannot change is only achieved when one can let go of themselves and their ego. It’s something which only comes when one is truly secure.
Stephanie Garcia
on August 13th, 2007
“Would you like learn how to do the things you cannot? Would you like for me to show you?”
Yes. To not feel like this anymore would be great lol
Prasand J.
on August 13th, 2007
Then, you have already taken the first step. To cast away all fear, and doubt. Though know this … before, I wouldn’t have denied you. You said, openly … clearly that you would not have taken advantage of that. However, that was a lie. When a person is not used to getting what they want, when they finally do it’s easy for them to relish in their own desires. I understood that, and was fine with that … because in my eyes, what you want takes precedence over my own desires. Therefore, what was needed to be done professionally … the adjustment … would’ve been easier on you. Since it would’ve been me catering to your desires as a lover would.
Now, at times you will be denied.
This will not be a walk in the park.
You have a chance to renig on your “yes” … will you stand by it?
Stephanie Garcia
on August 13th, 2007
Yes, I will stand by it.
Catherine
on August 28th, 2007
I accept my responsibility as a lover, only if feelings of worth are regarded in an atmosphere where individual differences are appreciated, and if communication is open and honest; if rules are flexible and love is shown openly, via touch, speech and where its burden invigorates the soul; not to mention where mistakes are adhered to as a vessel for learning so that the future love has evolved into something pleasurable. Love for me can only flourish when individuality is addressed and appreciated, for through those feelings of worth that ebb and flow through myself and my lover can love ever be acknowledged. To give myself? It depends on the convenience of its worth, for even a love that detracts from the soul can add to a richer love to be applied to the future. So yes, I am the responsibility, the pleasure, the giver of self… responsible to love itself, despite convenience…
Jenna Marshall
on September 5th, 2007
I don’t. The sad truth is that i’m naturally quite a selfish cunt….i generally tend to only give if i have recieved first. Therefore to be able to please a lover…they’d have to please me first. However, to afew people i would do anything for, i’m quite a good listener if i care about what the person is saying…and if said person is someone i care about, i don’t mind giving them my time to try and understand. My relationship with my ex was pretty complex, i had feelings for him that i’ve never experienced on many different levels….i don’t know if it was ‘love’, but i would have done anything for him. He’s the only person i’ve completely given myself to, pyshically and emotionally, even before we became ‘girlfriend and boyfriend’ he was the closest thing i had to a meaningful relationship, and i gladly would have called him my lover, aswell as my best friend. Until he slept with one of my mates deeming himself an untrustworthy bastard. I think the whole labelling ourselves as a couple was a huge mistake…not only do i hate being labelled as anybodies ‘girlfriend’, i think it scared him because he finally realised he had to commit himself to me. Which blatantly was harder for him than i thought it would be…he couldn’t accept the responsibility, as i can admit myself that i’m pretty tough to tend to. I don’t understand what happened….everything about our relationship was passionate, even after being given roles. But i think my role beforehand, where i was someone he was attracted to, infatuated by and had sex with on the odd occasion was a more appropriate one. We had always said becoming an official couple would ruin what we have, and so happens, it did.
I agree…society has devalued titles we give one another. Just like the word ‘love’ has lost alot of its meaning because it is used far too loosely, and said far too much. It’s easy to tell someone you love them…but it’s not enough, to be able to play the role of someones love is a different story. And it shouldn’t be done without understanding
Prasand J.
on October 21st, 2007
I enjoyed that.
I used to believe wholeheartedly in the sanctity of marriage. I had a very closed perception as to how it should be … and was very much into monogamy (though many didn’t believe that). However, in letting go of myself … I realize that those things are unnecessary when lovers are understanding of one another. That as people focus on titles, they tend to neglect what to me truly matters … and that’s the substance. False senses of security are created, whereas without the title no false sense of security are created and a person is left to either … become secure, or problematic.
Then with understanding … and supporting one another, I realize that if my lover desired another (or did something similar for another reason) … that means even being understanding of that, and accepting them in that regard. Thus, the more I became a lover … the more polygamous my mindset became. It doesn’t mean “I’ll sleep around” but more so, “if my lover decides to, it’s cool.” However, to state or insinuate “I will not be with anyone else but you” creates expectations, and as such … leads to disappointment. When titles are given, solitary devotion is the standard expectation. Even if I end up with a title again, I will make sure to be clear about such things.
“Do what you want, when you want … because I love you I’ll accept and support you irrespective of my personal biases or limits.”
Prasand J.
on October 21st, 2007
I like how that was worded … and a flawless logic. It’s only flaw would be that it has none, lol. =P
Miss Victoria Murder
on October 24th, 2007
*winks*
you know it.
Prasand J.
on October 24th, 2007
of course … and appreciate it, sincerely, always.
Prasand J.
on September 3rd, 2008
Here’s something I wrote as a response to someone else’s blog, but I think it’s appropriate:
————-
————-
Maybe you should stop dreaming about “the one”.
I say that because, the only way dreams become reality is through luck … or willpower. However, can we assert willpower onto making the dream of “the one” into reality? No, and as such we’re left with relying on luck / fortune. It’s a rather helpless position, one of insecurity and due to that instability you’ll always bounce back and forth between doubt and belief. — When it doesn’t have to be that way. Please permit me to present you with an alternative.
—
Many of us have fantasies and dream about what “the one” is, and while their fantasies might not be real … or rather might not actually be how the interaction with “the one” will play out … it doesn’t make their existence any less real. “The one” is not so much of a belief as it’s natural fact, so if faith in “the one” is lost … to regain it all one has to realize is that “the one” is as real as water, and oxygen.
To give this a secure foundation …
we connect to others to varying degrees. The synchronicity of that connection determines how much the other person effects us. Drugs like PT-141 were created to artifically reproduce reactions caused by extreme connections. In that case, it was specifically through the sense of smell … which played on the scent receptors creating a reaction so primal that it preceded / superceded all sexual psychosis, and libidal issues. In other words, there are key scents which cause varying sexual responses within us … some so extreme that no matter how hard we try to fight the desire, we can’t (because it’s biologically based and not psychologically).
The same is true for all of our senses (all six, intuition being the scientifically documented sixth but untaught sixth since it’s considered an irrational function, while the others are rational. It’s very difficult to teach about an irrational function, as such they don’t bother doing so, but if you check the dictionary you’ll see intuition is actually a sense). Therefore indicating that these connections while being had naturally, can also be extreme. In order for science to duplicate those things, those things must have previously existed. Meaning, scientists cannot create a match if a match is not already possible. Thus, we all have a key sequence encoded into our very biology. — If there is someone in the world we connect less with, then there is someone in the world we connect more with. — “The one” can be seen as the person we connect the most with.
How we react to “the one” is another matter entirely. Because of our conscious minds, and how broken we are … a person may become hostile due to the vulnerability of interacting with that person (if due to their experiences they have developed a resentment to situations of vulnerability, hostility may be the result of encountering “the one”). In another case, the person may go by unnoticed, simply because … when things fit into place, it’s a peaceful interaction. Tranquil. Thus, there are no sharp edges, nothing being pushed or pulled to indicate that there’s anything going on at all. Only if a person is paying attention to how comfortable the other person makes them feel (or something similar) … will they notice it “if” comfort is the reaction they get from the person (as previously said, the reaction may instead be hostile).
Ironically, our friends are more akin to “the one” than our romantic partners. It’s the very reason why we can share things with our friends that we cannot with our romantic partners, the natural desire to do so is there … because they “fit”. Conversely, romantic partners are often born due to passion. Passion which is created by conflict (hence the opposites attract, opposite being “oppose” thus they bump heads and aren’t complimentary like many would delude … someone that fits into place is complimentary opposite, not regular opposite … in other words, they don’t oppose / conflict and as such it lacks the typically sought type of passion). So we often spend a lot of time trying to make relationships work with someone we don’t fit with … simply because our passion / desires are overriding our common sense, and as we’re busy with these opposites … the tranquil lovers go by unnoticed. In many cases, in order to truly acknowledge “the one” we must reach a point where we truly desire to end the conflicts and drama in our lives.
Most people “claim” they don’t like such things (drama, conflict, etc), but their very actions prove otherwise. They listen to sad music when they are sad, thus amplifying and / or promoting their sadness (so obviously they want to be and enjoy being sad and are releshing in their sadness, but most would not admit that they enjoy being sad and yet, they prove that they desire it). They pursue / advocate independancy, and as such shun unity (aka shun relationships and advocate war / conflicts), etc, etc. — The more we are able to appreciate serenity and stillness, the more we will notice those tranquil lovers and experience a different kind of passion (one born of surrender / submission, which cannot be had with a person that we do not connect with … for how can they accept us, if we don’t even fit into place with them? they naturally reject because of that lack of matching).
To put the whole opposite and complimentary opposite into perspective (it in a sense shatters what most people are taught). It is important to realize that the foundation of opposite is “oppose”, thus must be a situation of conflict. However, draw a capital letter “U” in your mind, and flip the U on it’s side. Then across from that U … draw the opposite shape (mirror image), and you’ll see that the curves of the two U’s can never match up. Since in order for the curve of the U’s to match up, they must essentially be the same (same direction, angle, etc). Complimentary opposites are more similar than dissimilar. That’s why they can match up, because they have the same curves, bends, and flex the same way. — Therefore a relationship with someone who is your opposite, can never truly last … because they aren’t complimentary (if they were, they wouldn’t really be so different).
The whole opposite / compliment thing has been fucked up by our misunderstanding society. For example, “strong” and “weak” are opposites, right? Yet, if you truly imagined a weak person opposing a strong person you’d see that the weak person would get abused / slaughtered / steam-rolled. That’s because the weak person doesn’t actually oppose the strong person (thus they are not opposite). When you have wars with the downtrodden against the fortunate, it’s actually the strong versus the strong. Or else those so called weak people, wouldn’t be able to stand up against and oppose the strong people.
In the case of the letter U, the one that was drawn and was opposite … was actually opposing, and conflicting. However, a complimentary opposite is not only a mirror, but also upside down. However, that’s another matter … about inverses that I won’t go into.
—
None of the previous means, we will ever meet “the one” in our lifetime … only that “the one” exists. However, with the myriad of people in the world and the varying degrees of a connection, it’s possible that we’ll never cross paths with that person. It’s also possible that if we do, we may not ever consciously acknowledge them. Therefore, what requires faith is not that the person exists … but faith in us actually meeting and consciously acknowledging that person. Most people give up long before that happens. — One could postulate that if the person is synchronous, then it’s inevitable that we’d cross paths … because our lives would be synchronous as well. But that’s merely introducing fantasy, and it becomes something of “belief”.
While the lives being synchronous may possibly be true, is it definitely the case?
Absolutely not. Therefore we’d be fantasizing in that case, and we in a sense begin to skew our perception of what “the one” is with such fantasies. So let’s keep this realistic. — While the most extreme connection may never be encountered, we do and will encounter lesser connections in our everyday lives. Let’s say that today we encounter a 98% match instead of a 100%. That 2% missing is the difference / conflict that exists between us and them. That may be minor in many people’s eyes, but “where” the two conflict with … might be a major issue for them. Maybe he’s gay, and maybe she’s not.
Which brings into play my personal beliefs.
I personally forgo faith in “the one”, because for me it’s not necessary.
I believe that because of our experiences and varying degrees of brokenness … even if we did encounter the greatest possible match, it would still be off by a little bit. Since we’re not exactly in the best shape, nor condition. I mean, we sometimes resist / deny those we love while claiming it’s because we love them (when in truth it’s merely due to self-love). We have so many delusions and insecurities, can any of us truly state we’re in the best condition and “ready” for “the one” (or a healthy relationship in general)? Someone else might say, “the one is a person who’s perfect for me as I am, flaws and all.” I’d agree with that to some degree … but not exactly.
Since we all change and grow with each day that passes by. Such a person who’s appropriate for us as we are now … we’d eventually grow apart from, since who we are is seemingly constantly changing / evolving. There must be something that holds the two parties together, so the ability to “grow together” is often fundamental to a lasting relationship. If the two people are flawless from the door, they cannot truly mesh and “grow together”. So that 2% difference is actually necessary. Thus in my eyes , that 98% match is actually the 100% match (potentially). It’s the highest (realistic) match we will encounter in our lives. In someone else’s life their highest may be in my standards a 68% match, but it’s still the highest for them … and thus is “the one” for them in their life.
“The one” can’t be consistently defined mathematically. It’s relative to the person, and what their greatest match or compatibility might be. The more aware the person is of their conflicts and synchronicities in life, if they actually pursue interactions / relationships with those that they are synchronous (doesn’t mean in a romantic sense, but the person “can” persue them romantically) … it’s probable that their standard of greatest match would be higher than another’s (if the other person wasn’t fortunate). — Regardless of those differences in standards, if we understand the way “soulmates” work, we can more readilly take control of our destiny … and remove the chance from it, bringing it closer to inevitability.
If only we stop dreaming, and start truly seeing what’s there.
It’s up to us to pay attention to our relationships, appreciate them instead of focusing on what doesn’t exist in our lives. For as we pay attention to the horizon … many people pass by us, unnoticed. It is only when we truly see what we have, that we’re able to truly wield and utilize what we have. As such, my recommendation to anyone would be … mastering these things, in this order:
acknowledgement (listening, paying attention is required), understanding (accepting, submitting, not judging in a ridiculing manner), and appreciation.
There is something else we must learn in order to be ready for a healthy relationship. We must learn to give up our independance (being able to be supportive of another, and allow ourselves to be supported). It doesn’t mean we have to be dependant, nah not at all … all it means is we have to be able to rely on them (even if we don’t actually do so, we must have the ability … most people fear it so much that they don’t even allow themselves to do so even when they need to), we must learn how to truly trust them. However, that is not something we can master on our own. To learn it on our own would defeat the premise of it. — It’s something we’d have to learn through our varying relationships.
The more one masters those things … the more they will see, that soulmate is actually plural. For there are many 98% matches in the world. They all just match a bit differently (or so I believe, I’ve personally only encountered one 98% match, and a few 96 and 97’s … that 98% might’ve been the only one I can actually call “the one”). And “the one” becomes not defined in how compatible the two are … but instead might be discovered in how much the two soulmates desire to be together. Reflected in their willingness to surrender to each other.
There’s much more about this subject I can go on about, but I’ll refrain from doing so. However, we can have a more intimate discussion about it if you’d like. Even if that doesn’t happen, I hope that the preceeding will make the future seem a bit more optimistic and within your grasp / ability / assertion / will.
and btw … the subway penis guy, yeah that shit might not have been funny to you cause you went through it … but it was hilarious to me, even thinking about it now makes me chuckle. lmfaoooo.
I genuinely / sincerely hope all is well in your heart and mind.
- Prasand J.
Pavana
on September 7th, 2008
My problem is, I so badly want to FALL in love with someone who I can give my 100 percent to, that my standards are set also at a bar too high, because I am not ready to give 100% to someone who is only going to give 99. And I say it’s a “problem” only because, I’ve been single for 3 years now. I’ve met good guys, surely, but none whom have satisfied me truly. And it’s depressing…this standard I have in my mind stops me from actually going anywhere further with men I have met..potentially good men. My own insecurities? Yeah, probably. But it’s something I just can’t seem to shake off. Maybe one day I can..until then, I really don’t know. Great read…my apple tasted 100 times better as I browsed this entry =]
Prasand J.
on September 7th, 2008
Although I perceive your question to be rhetorical … I’ll address it anyway. Yes, it is your insecurities. Your fear creates much of your perception and the way you handle those situations. The irony is, because of that fear it’s possible that the one who was 99% was actually 100% but you didn’t allow yourself to see it because you were too afraid to commit to it, playing with possibilities of “what if”. Dreaming, instead of dealing with reality as it is.
Is that the truth? I don’t know. It’s merely possible. But it’s a fact that you dream and do not deal with reality as it is because of your fear. Dreams are born of dissatisfaction. We dream of something which is better or worse than what is because we are not satisfied with what is. So we in a sense avoid reality as we create delusions (that is, unless the person’s dreaming idly).
Regardless, if you’d like to overcome your fear … then overcome your ego, for that is what causes you to be divided from others. Your egotisicalness is why you desire to be unique (separate from others) it’s also a security mechanism and fear based. That is why you are not able to give yourself (as such you are separate). So the irony to your advocation about those that do not dare to be unique is that there are many who fear “not” being unique. As such, they try hard to be something they are not.
As we overcome the ego we are more readilly able to accept ourselves (love ourselves), and others. It is then that the individuality is erased and we are capable of becoming lovers.– Acceptance of the other is only one part of being a lover. However, in order to accept the aspects we clash in (aka reject) we must put aside our differences, and surrender ourselves (our identity, perception, etc). It is then that as one truly becomes a lover … the 1% difference, will become irrelevant.
Pavana
on September 7th, 2008
Yes…I do know it’s my insecurities driving me away. Problem…realized. Solution? Still up in the air.
About the ego comment. I don’t find myself egotistical in the least bit. Confident? Sure..but never would I say I have a big ego. I actually sometimes feel that it’s me who’s not good enough for most people…actually I feel that many times. I don’t have 100 men coming upto me and asking me out…no not at all. It’s in my mind..I have friends, potential lovers. But in my mind I won’t allow it to go farther because of my insecurities…not my ego at all.
Prasand J.
on September 8th, 2008
We do not have to have a big ego in order to be egostical.
The ego is one’s perception of self separate from others. The ego is one’s identity. The ego is the “self”. Therefore if we are doing anything which is selfish, we are being egotistical. So everytime we use the word “I” we’re being egotistical. Everytime we advocate what we are, and are not … we are being egotistical. Everytime we reject something, we are being egotistical. As such, you defended against that without truly understanding. It offended your identity thus you were being egotistical.
Egotism is the motivation to maintain a favorable view of oneself. — Therefore, your second paragraph was an act of egotism. And yet, you advocate that you’re not egotistical, while actually proving that you are in that very moment. Your reaction was premature, without understanding. Such is what happens when one is insecure. What you also do not understand is that insecurity is egotistical. So you say it’s due to your insecurities, but not your ego at all?
Premature and ignorant.
The problem is because of fear you separate yourself from those would be lovers, because of an actual deminished self worth you overcompensate and perceive yourself to be better than them (thus, you are being egotistical at that moment). So because you were not willing to accept that as truth … you perceived there to be no solution. When I already gave you one.
Dissolve your delusions, perceive the truth.
It’s a lengthy task, but without that one cannot overcome their ego.
Brenda
on October 5th, 2009
This is EXACTLY what I needed to hear and read. Great post! I love the idea that Japan carries with the exchanging of diaries.